Topics

Enter your email address below to subscribe to The Florida Jury Selection Blog and receive instant notification of new cases and cutting-edge techniques.
 

Syndicate

Subscribe to MyMSN Subscribe to MyYahoo!
Subscribe to Google Reader Subscribe to Bloglines
RSS Feed Help with feeds

Categories

Links

Florida Personal Injury Lawyer

Archives

Late Night Jury Deliberations OK’d

March 26th, 2007

In a criminal trial the jury wanted to deliberate late into the night. The closing arguments were concluded at 9:20 p.m., and the jury returned its verdict shortly after midnight –Guilty. Earlier in the afternoon (around 4:00 p.m.), defense counsel had requested the trial be adjourned and resumed the next day so that the jury would have enough time review all the evidence. The trial judge asked the jury what they wanted to do and they decided to work into the night. Two jurors had to go to work the next day.

While noting its agreement with the general propostion that jury trials should not continue late into the evening, the First District Court of Appeal in Green v. State, 951 So. 2d 962 (Fla. 1 DCA 2007), affirmed the jury’s verdict because the trial judge had asked the jurors what they wanted to do, and the court repeatedly checked their mental state to make sure they could continue with their deliberations. The Court distinguished the leading case of Ferrer v. State, 718 So. 2d 822 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) because in Ferrer defense counsel had objected to proceeding late into the evening on the grounds that counsel was too fatigued to serve as competent counsel and that he was not physically able to proceed. That was not the case here because defense counsel never argued that she was unable to provide adequate legal representation, and it did not appear that her performance was affected in any way by the court’s decision to proceed with the trial.

Entry Filed under: General Voir Dire

1 Comment Add your own

  • 1. LH  |  March 28th, 2007 at 5:27 pm

    I was present at this trial and there are numerous other arguments that the attorney made justifying the appeal that the Appeals Court completely ignored. The most important being that a piece of evidence that was introduced was never view by the jury. The reason it was not viewed is because it was over an hour and one half long and was deemed too long to be played in the courtroom so the jury NEVER watched it at all – not even in the jury room because of it’s length. That is the issue here, not necessarily the late night deliberations but the absolute FACT that an important piece of evidence was NEVER viewed by the jury because it WAS late in the evening. This should NEVER have been permitted by the judge when the defendant was facing a potential 35 years in prison. Also the FACT that the jury returned quilty of lesser crimes and in fact found the defendant not quilty of one of the charges shows that had to be some form of disagreement going on the in jury room and the viewing of the video may have caused them to return not guilty in one or all of the other charges. At best this was a compromise verdict so that the jury could go home!

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed