Follow us on Facebook

Enter your email address below to subscribe to The Florida Jury Selection Blog and receive instant notification of new cases and cutting-edge techniques.

Suscribe to RSS Feed

Posts filed under 'Questions About “The Law”'

Supreme Court Approves Paraphrasing of Standard Jury Instruction during Voir Dire

During jury selection in a first degree murder case, the prosecutor paraphrased the standard jury instruction on premeditation, and made certain statements regarding the presumption of innocence. The Supreme Court held it was not error to do so because the prosecutor’s comments were “largely identical to the standard jury instruction,” and, at the conclusion of the case, the jury was correctly instructed on both the presumption of innocence and premeditation. Belcher v. State, 961 So. 2d 239 (Fla 2007). See also, Ramirez v. State, 901 So2d 332 (Fla 3rd DCA 2005) in which the 3rd DCA elaborated on counsel’s right to ask prospective jurors about “the law” and their ability to follow the law.

Add comment July 23rd, 2007

Court Approves “Hypothetical Questions” in Voir Dire

The Third District Court of Appeal recently approved the use of hypothetical questions by counsel during jury selection provided the questions are “designed to determine whether the jurors could correctly apply the law.” In Moore v. State, __ So2d __ (Fla 3 DCA Oct 4, 2006) the Court approved the use of hypothetical questions designed to explain the difference between testimonial evidence and physical evidence to prospective jurors.

Continue Reading Add comment October 31st, 2006